Preview build. Listings are real software, described from each company's own website. No company has joined yet, so there are no deals, scores or reviews, and no purchases are processed.

Open source / Google Analytics

Open-source alternatives to Google Analytics

Plausible Analytics, Umami and Matomo are open source: free to download and run on your own server. Google Analytics costs free plan; paid plans vary, with a free plan.

Plausible Analytics

Open source (AGPL-3.0) · Open-source website analytics that works without cookies

Plausible is a lightweight, open-source web analytics tool hosted in the EU that tracks traffic without cookies. It is for site owners and marketers who want simple reports.

  • Real-time traffic dashboard
  • Campaign and UTM tracking
  • Goals and revenue tracking
  • Funnels
  • Bot filtering

30-day free trial. Paid plans from $9 a month for up to 10,000 monthly pageviews. Yearly billing gives 2 months free.

Umami

Open source (MIT) · Privacy-first website analytics without cookies

Umami measures website traffic, campaigns, conversions and revenue without cookies or tracking people across sites. It runs on your own server or in Umami's cloud.

  • No cookies needed
  • Traffic, campaigns and conversions
  • Revenue reporting
  • Self-hosted or cloud
  • API

Free to download and run on your own server under the MIT licence; you pay only for your hosting.

Matomo

Open source (GPL-3.0) · Open-source web analytics, an alternative to Google Analytics

Matomo (formerly Piwik) is a full web analytics platform you install on your own server, giving you full ownership of your data. Its makers say it is used on more than 1.4 million websites.

  • Full web analytics reports
  • 100% data ownership
  • Privacy features built in
  • Real-time reports
  • Plugins marketplace

Free to download and run on your own server under the GPL-3.0 licence; you pay only for your hosting.

Before you switch

  • Free to use, not free to run. The licence costs nothing, but self-hosting needs a server (often $5 to $40 a month) and someone to install updates and keep backups.
  • Open core means the main product is open source but some features, usually for larger teams, need a paid licence.
  • Hosted versions exist for many of these, run by the makers. They cost money but save the upkeep, and you can still move to your own server later.
  • Licences differ. MIT and Apache allow almost anything. GPL and AGPL require you to share changes you make to the code; for normal business use, that rarely matters.

More open-source alternatives